设为首页收藏本站我的收藏

大耳朵英语社区

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 4689|回复: 19

考研英语阅读理解文章01-Pass the chalk

[复制链接]
发表于 2017-2-27 15:18:23 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Pass the chalk
Not helpful


BACK in 1922, Thomas Edison predicted that "the motion picture is destined to revolutionize our educational system and...in a few years it will supplant largely, if not entirely, the use of textbooks." Well, we all make mistakes. But at least Edison did not squander vast quantities of public money on installing cinema screens in schools around the country.

With computers, the story has been different. Many governments have packed them into schools, convinced that their presence would improve the pace and efficiency of learning. Large numbers of studies, some more academically respectable than others, have purported to show that computers help children to learn. Now, however, a study that compares classes with computers against similar classes without them casts doubt on that view.

In the current Economic Journal, Joshua Angrist of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Victor Lavy of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem look at a scheme which put computers into many of Israel's primary and middle schools in the mid-1990s. Dr Angrist and Dr Lavy compare the test scores for maths and Hebrew achieved by children in the fourth and eighth grades (ie, aged about nine and 13) in schools with and without computers. They also asked the classes' teachers how they used various teaching materials, such as Xeroxed worksheets and, of course, computer programs. The researchers found that the Israeli scheme had much less effect on teaching methods in middle schools than in elementary schools. It also found no evidence that the use of computers improved children's test scores. In fact, it found the reverse. In the case of the maths scores of fourth-graders, there was a consistently negative relationship between computer use and test scores.

The authors offer three possible explanations of why this might be. First, the introduction of computers into classrooms might have gobbled up cash that would otherwise have paid for other aspects of education. But that is unlikely in this case since the money for the programme came from the national lottery, and the study found no significant change in teaching resources, methods or training in schools that acquired computers through the scheme.

A second possibility is that the transition to using computers in instruction takes time to have an effect. Maybe, say the authors, but the schools surveyed had been using the scheme's computers for a full school year. That was enough for the new computers to have had a large (and apparently malign) influence on fourth-grade maths scores. The third explanation is the simplest: that the use of computers in teaching is no better (and perhaps worse) than other teaching methods.

The bottom line, says Dr Angrist, is that "the costs are clear-cut and the benefits are murky." The burden of proof now lies with the promoters of classroom computers. And the only reliable way to make their case is, surely, to conduct a proper study, with children randomly allocated to teachers who use computers and teachers who use other methods, including the cheapest of all: chalk and talk.

1.We can learn from the first paragraph that __________________.
[A] motion picture has revolutionized education system
[B] Edison’s prediction has been proved wrong
[C] Edison encouraged schools to install cinema screens
[D] schools are cautious about Edison’s idea

2.Dr. Angrist and Dr. Lavy have done the following except _______________.
[A] comparing the test scores of students in different age groups
[B] interviewing teachers about their teaching methods
[C] launching the computer program in many Israeli schools
[D] explaining students’ school performance

3.According to Dr. Angrist and Dr. Lavy, in the Israeli scheme, students didn’t make improvement in their test scores because______________.
[A] other aspects of education were affected due to cash shortage
[B] it was not long enough for the program to take effect
[C] there was a negative relationship between computer use and test scores
[D] the use of computer was no better than other teaching methods

4.It can be inferred from the last paragraph that ________________.
[A] there hasn’t been a proper study on this issue yet
[B] school authorities should provide proof to support the computer program
[C] installing computers in schools costs too much, but has little or no effect
[D] chalk and talk work better than computer in teaching

5.The author’s attitude towards governments’ packing computers in schools seems to be ___________________.
[A] biased
[B] indifferent
[C] disapproving
[D] puzzling

篇章剖析:
本文为说明文,采用新闻报道体,在第一段以爱迪生所作的错误预测开始,将其与第二段中学校期望通过将电脑引入课堂来改进教学的想法进行对照,引入话题,指出学校的上述想法未必正确。第三段叙述了两位研究人员对以色列在1990年代中期将电脑引入中小学课堂所带来的教学效果的研究,以此说明电脑未必如人们所期望的那样促进课堂学习。第四段,第五段,第六段分别引述了研究人员的解释,并逐一进行分析,最后得出结论:要证明电脑有助于教学,必须进行正确的研究。

词汇注释:
supplant v. 取代,代替(另一个)
squander v. 挥霍或浪费;放荡地花掉
purport v. 声称
Hebrew n. 以色列语;希伯来人
Xerox v. 复印
reverse n. 相反,颠倒:相反的事物或相反的方面
gobble v. 吞并;贪婪地攫取
transition n. 转变, 转换
malign adj. 有害的:具不良影响的;有害的
the bottom line 要点或关键之处;结果,结局:最后结果或声明
randomly adv. 任意地, 随便地,
allocate  v. 分派, 分配

难句突破
1.First, the introduction of computers into classrooms might have gobbled up cash that would otherwise have paid for other aspects of education.
主体句式:the introduction might have gobbled up cash
结构分析:本句是一个主从复合句,主句中的might have gobbled up表示对过去事实的猜测,that引导一个定语从句,限定修饰cash,其中从句中的otherwise常常用来引出虚拟语气,表示“要不然;在另一种情况下”。例如:Otherwise I might have helped you. 要不然我就帮你了。
句子译文:第一,将电脑引入课堂可能会占用本应用于其它教育方面的资金。

2.And the only reliable way to make their case is, surely, to conduct a proper study, with children randomly allocated to teachers who use computers and teachers who use other methods, including the cheapest of all: chalk and talk.
主体句式:the way is to conduct a study
结构分析:本句是一个复杂长句,不但涉及主从句,还涉及不定式,分词和介词短语。第一个不定式to make their case作定语修饰way,第二个不定式作表语;with引导的介词短语往往可以是“介词+复合宾语”的形式,其中复合宾语可以由现在分词或者过去分词来充当,由它和介词宾语之间的逻辑关系决定,例如:with her hair flying in the wind;with the paper tucked under his arm等;who引导的定语从句修饰教师,分词including 引导的短语限定修饰methods。
句子译文:而他们所能采用的唯一可靠方法当然就是进行适当的研究,学生应该是随机分配给使用电脑教学的教师和使用其他方法教学的教师,包括最廉价的方法:粉笔和谈话。

参考答案回复可见:
游客,如果您要查看本帖隐藏内容请回复


发表于 2017-3-15 22:16:04 | 显示全部楼层
thank you :):):):):)
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2017-5-15 09:30:07 | 显示全部楼层
THANK YOU ! 谢谢!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2017-5-15 16:38:27 | 显示全部楼层
b  d  cc  d
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2017-6-26 11:45:26 | 显示全部楼层
thank you so much
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2017-6-26 11:46:36 | 显示全部楼层
thank you so much
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2018-1-31 14:48:28 | 显示全部楼层
答案呢。我做的CCDCC不知对了几个
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2018-2-22 14:50:47 | 显示全部楼层
.And the only reliable way to make their case is, surely, to conduct a proper study, with children randomly allocated to teachers who use computers and teachers who use other methods, including the cheapest of all: chalk and talk.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2018-7-17 21:05:19 | 显示全部楼层
:victory::victory::victory::victory::victory:
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /1 下一条

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|大耳朵英语社区 ( 客服QQ群:19012993  

GMT+8, 2018-12-15 12:25

Powered by Discuz!

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表